The Indigenous Health Crisis: A Summary

“If you were an Indigenous citizen of this country,
how acceptable would this be?”

Dr Kerryn Phelps, AMA President in 2003

How big is the problem?

The health of Indigenous Australians is the worst in the developed world, with life expectancies 20 years less than other Australians. Alarmingly, the crisis is getting worse rather than better. In similar countries, such as New Zealand, the US and Canada, the health of Indigenous peoples has been rapidly improved by determined government action over the last 25 years. Why not in Australia?

Despite its severity, the Indigenous health crisis is both solveable and preventable.

The Right to Health

“The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.”
World Health Organisation Constitution 1946. [1]

Health is a human right that is directly linked to other fundamental human rights: housing, education, employment, Indigenous rights to self-determination, enjoyment and protection of their cultures and relationships to land.

This link between health and rights was acknowledged in the National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health, endorsed in July 2003 by all Australian governments, which has as its goal:

“To ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples enjoy a healthy life equal to that of the general population that is enriched by a strong living culture, dignity and justice.”

Why is Indigenous health so bad?

The answer is a compound of social and economic disadvantage - poverty, poor nutrition, poor housing, low education levels and high unemployment – along with social marginalisation, prejudice and racism. [2]

These negative social conditions and the poor health typically associated with them have been compounded by the long term failure of governments to fulfil their responsibilities to provide adequate services and infrastructure for Indigenous communities and to address the socio-economic disadvantage of Indigenous people.

In tackling health and disadvantage, a significant difference between Australia and countries such as Canada, New Zealand and the US, is the existence of treaties which have resulted in more direct federal government responsibility. This has enabled better coordinated health services, and improved access to resources and infrastructure. [3]

How do we address the problems?

We already know where to start. Many inquiries and reports have produced the same recommendations. All that is wanting is the political will to implement these recommendations.

A National Aboriginal Health Strategy (NAHS) was developed in 1989. The principal finding of the 1994 Review of the NAHS was that ‘the NAHS was never effectively implemented’ (See 'Key Recommendations' below).

Responsibility lies primarily with Commonwealth, state and territory governments that have control over policy implementation, funding provision and Indigenous participation. [4]

Initiatives such as the Commonwealth Government's Primary Health Care Access Program (PHCAP) are steps in the rights direction, however, available funding is way below what is required to meet current needs (see 'How much will it cost?' below).

It’s time to act!

The latest incarnation of the NAHS, the National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health - A Framework for Action by Governments, says that

“whilst some significant successes have been realised, the ad hoc approaches of the past have resulted in many unsustainable programs, uncoordinated activity, gaps, duplication and inefficient use of resources.”

It is not good enough to revise strategy every few years. It is well past time to act.

Major Recommendations
1994 Review of the National Aboriginal Health Strategy

1. That the Commonwealth reaffirm its commitment to the principles underlying the NAHS including:

  • acceptance of Aboriginal people’s holistic view of health
  • recognition of the importance of local Aboriginal community control and participation and
  • intersectoral collaboration.

2. That the achievement of equity, by which is meant equal access to equal care appropriate to need in comparison with non-Aboriginal Australia, remains a major goal.

3. That there be a partnership in pursuit of this goal between the Commonwealth, State and Territory governments, ATSIC and NACCHO at the national, State/Territory and regional levels.

4. That a human rights based approach to funding be adopted with major increases for all aspects of Aboriginal health ... As much as $2 billion would be needed in funding just to meet the backlog in housing and essential services in remote and rural communities...

5. That the Commonwealth declare its resolve to achieve Indigenous health gains.

What works?

The Indigenous health crisis can be solved and we already have a good understanding of what works.

Indigenous Australians experience many barriers to accessing mainstream health services. Aboriginal community-controlled health services have therefore proved to be a critical element, having delivered 1.34 million episodes of primary health care in 2001-2. [5] Development and strengthening of the sector is needed to further improve outcomes.

For example, the recent Coordinated Care Trial involving the pooling of Northern Territory and Commonwealth health funding to the Aboriginal-controlled Katherine West Health Board, has been a clear success. [6] The Board, which directly manages Indigenous health services for the entire region, has delivered significant improvements in health care.

The Aboriginal-controlled Maari Ma Health Service in Broken Hill is another success story. With a health agreement with NSW and the Commonwealth and a partnership with the Royal Flying Doctor Service, Maari Ma provides health services for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities across the entire western NSW region. [7]

Such new approaches complement existing Aboriginal controlled health services, such as the Nganampa Health Council, which has provided comprehensive primary health care services to the Anangu Pitjantjajara Lands for over 20 years.

These success stories demonstrate the importance of Aboriginal control based on principles of self-determination and effective community governance. [8] They also demonstrate the importance of governments adopting a cooperative approach based on meaningful negotiation with and participation of Indigenous communities.

Indigenous health services are not the whole of the solution. Effort is also required to ensure better, and more culturally-appropriate access to mainstream medical services.

There are other essential elements to solving the health crisis. Foremost is adequate and sustained funding based on need. Indigenous health problems require more than band-aids. Inadequate, short-term funding cannot produce lasting improvements.

A skilled and appropriate workforce is also essential. [9] Recent research for the AMA estimated that a 50% increase in doctors and allied health professionals working in Indigenous health is required. [10]

"Nganampa Health Council is one of the leading community controlled health services in Australia and this is due to the quality of the staff, the strong management systems in place, and the high level of Anangu employment and participation in the organisation". John W Singer, Director - Nganampa Health Council.

“Effective community governance is the key to improving outcomes for our people”. Richard Weston, Regional Director – Maari Ma Health, Broken Hill.

How much will it cost?

Access Economics was commissioned by the AMA to estimate workforce and funding needs in Indigenous health. They estimated afunding shortfall of $452.5 million a year, including $400 million in primary health care services . [11]

Australia spends over $60 billion annually on health. [12] The additional funding required to achieve equitable health outcomes for Indigenous people amounts to less than 1% of this total expenditure.

Yet in the 2004/05 Federal Budget, only $10 million a year was provided in additional funding for primary health care - 40 times less than Access Economic' estimation of need!

« Back to Facts
«
Back to Action Kit contents

Endnotes


[1]. The World Health Organisation constitution, adopted with Australian support, laid the foundation for the codification of the right to health in numerous UN treaties to which Australia is a party. Other UN instruments relevant to Indigenous health rights include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948); the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966); the International Covenant on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965); the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979); and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Further information: Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, Paul Hunt, E/CN.4/2003/58. Back to text


[2] See ‘Social Determinants of Health’ section for further discussion about the effects of disadvantage on health. Back to text


[3]. Ian T Ring and David Firman, 1998, Reducing indigenous mortality in Australia: lessons from other countries, MJA 1998; 169: 528-533
Moran, M. 2000, Housing and health in indigenous communities in the USA, Canada and Australia: the significance of economic empowerment. In Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Bulletin, Issue 7, May 2000: ISSN 1329-3362. Back to text


[4]. Contrary to common belief, ATSIC (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission) did not have responsibility over, or receive funding for, Indigenous health. Back to text


[5] www.naccho.org.au. See Success Stories in Indigenous Health for examples. Back to text


[6] Commonwealth of Australia, 2001, Better Health Care: Studies in the Successful Delivery of Primary Health Care Services to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. The Coordinated Care Trials were an initiative of the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) to achieve greater coordination in the delivery of health care services. The focus of the Indigenous CCTs was on reforming local health care systems through community based organisations managing a pool of funds provided by the Commonwealth, State and Territory governments. The results have been encouraging. Back to text


[7] Senator Aden Ridgeway, Adjournment Speech, Indigenous Health and Maari Ma, 11 February 2004. Back to text


[8] The Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development has found that the most significant factors in successful social and economic development on American Indian reservations include:
• Indigenous control of decision-making (effective sovereignty);
• good governing institutions with strategic direction and effective leadership;
• culturally appropriate institutions of self-government. Back to text


[9]. Ring, Ian T & Ngaire Brown, “Indigenous health: chronically inadequate responses to damning statistics”. Medical Journal of Australia 2002 177 (11): 629-631. Back to text


[10] AMA Discussion Paper 2004, Healing Hands - Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Workforce Requirements, AMA, Canberra.
Back to text


[11] Ibid. Access Economics used a new methodology to determine current shortfalls, however, their results are broadly comparable to previous estimates by Professor John Deeble in Expenditures on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health, AMA 2003. Back to text


[12]. 2001-2 data: Australian Institute of Health & Welfare (AIHW). Back to text

« Back to Facts
«
Back to Action Kit contents


Healing Hands Indigenous Health Rights • www.antar.org.au
 Home   Intro  •  Facts    Action  • Events  • Contact  • Top